03-30-2017, 08:17 AM | #41 |
( ._.)
Posts: 13,877
|
A mi me importa
|
03-30-2017, 09:16 AM | #42 |
Trickster Demon
Posts: 59,746
|
|
03-30-2017, 09:55 AM | #43 |
Resident drug enabler
Posts: 45,473
|
When I think "ultimate thrill ride", I think Al Roker.
|
03-30-2017, 10:04 AM | #44 |
( ._.)
Posts: 13,877
|
I think Xavier Woods and Brad Maddox.
|
04-06-2017, 09:50 AM | #45 |
I am the cheese
Posts: 50,964
|
So did the 28-54 female demo move or nah?
|
04-06-2017, 05:39 PM | #46 |
Make the IWC Great Again
Posts: 8,922
|
Don't know, but WM was the most watched Mania is history. Unfortunately WWE doesn't release viewership by demo. I could ask around though.
|
04-06-2017, 06:13 PM | #47 |
I am the cheese
Posts: 50,964
|
Viewership was down this week so the answer is no, unless you want to argue that they lost voewers from the 18-30 male demo and the old braods helped even it out
|
04-06-2017, 06:22 PM | #48 |
Resident drug enabler
Posts: 45,473
|
WWE basically lowered their PPV price from $60 to $9.99 AND gave away a shitload of new original content AND archives to their video library... AND other major wrestling companies' video library AND gave all of this away for free or an even MORE reduced price to a shitload of other people in order to POSSIBLY get more people to watch WrestleMania.
SUCCESS! |
04-06-2017, 06:24 PM | #49 |
Resident drug enabler
Posts: 45,473
|
And in doing all that, how many more people are subscribers to the network than the $1.2 million which was the pre-network, $60 paying record? And how many of those didn't even have to pay the $9.99? And do we even know how many of those who were subscribers bothered to watch WrestleMania and don't just use the network for the archives and other programming?
Yeah... |
04-06-2017, 06:42 PM | #50 | |
I am the cheese
Posts: 50,964
|
Quote:
|
|
04-06-2017, 06:50 PM | #51 |
Resident drug enabler
Posts: 45,473
|
If they had just lowered the price of the PPVs that much, claiming a jump in people watching as a victory for the current product would be hilarious. The fact that there's ALL that on top of it... Come on... lol
|
04-06-2017, 06:55 PM | #52 |
Resident drug enabler
Posts: 45,473
|
Also, I watched at someone's house where 3 other people had the network. That's right. 3 people who had the network were watching on one subscription. Back in the day, that would have been counted as 1 buy. Now it's 4. Forgot to add that to my reasons the "more people watched than ever before" thing is bullshit. That's a pretty major one.
But CyNick will skew the fuck out of that number to actually try to make it still seem like WWE is at a peak in popularity. lol |