10-01-2016, 11:31 PM | #7561 |
Posts: 52,478
|
Heaven forbid Detroit wins in Baltimore Wednesday theyd have to go back to Toronto Thursday and if they win that game they have to go to Texas Friday
ATL to Det to Tor to Bal to Tor to Tex 6 days 6 games 6 cities |
10-02-2016, 04:53 AM | #7562 |
Posts: 52,478
|
No matter what happens today/Monday the Orioles are guaranteed to have at least 1 more game whether it be a 163 tie breaker or the Wild Card. So thetes that..
|
10-02-2016, 10:03 AM | #7563 |
boop/bop/beep
Posts: 38,428
|
feel like this is the lamest wildcard race... 3 teams who have done a lot of failing this year.
|
10-02-2016, 10:52 AM | #7564 |
President of Freedonia
Posts: 58,197
|
Most Mets fans are hoping for a Giants loss and Cards win today to force a Game 163...and then the Cards winning that because Martinez matches up better with the Mets' lefty-heavy lineup than Bumgarner.
Idk...I'd kinda rather the Giants just win it today. Not that I want to face Bumgarner but you're going to have to beat an ace sometime in the playoffs anyway. The Mets are going to be on 3 days rest (counting today as rest since the starters will sit), the Giants/Cards would only be on 1 day of rest if they have to play tomorrow. Baseball is the one sport where rest can be a detriment in the playoffs as it gives a hot team less time to cool down. Just look at how many 1 seeds have sat around for a week and then been buzzsawed by the Wild Card team in the new format. |
10-02-2016, 04:10 PM | #7565 |
TPWW Fire Pro Champ
Posts: 33,995
|
Mark Teixeira's last game today. Gonna miss that guy.
|
10-02-2016, 04:30 PM | #7566 |
Posts: 52,478
|
Os up 3-1
Tigers down 1-0 Jays scoreless with Boston Boston needs to get their shit together |
10-02-2016, 05:06 PM | #7567 |
Posts: 52,478
|
Or get no hit on the last day off the year losing 5 of last 6.
(insert truck backup sound here) |
10-02-2016, 05:40 PM | #7568 |
President of Freedonia
Posts: 58,197
|
Red Sox tie it.......but it might not matter as the Braves are embracing their roles as spoilers. Might not be getting any Game 163.
|
10-02-2016, 05:41 PM | #7569 |
Posts: 52,478
|
Orioles are a Wild Card..woo!
|
10-02-2016, 06:02 PM | #7570 |
Posts: 52,478
|
Detroit loses
Wild Card is Toronto vs Baltimore sure TBD |
10-02-2016, 06:10 PM | #7571 |
Best Poster
Posts: 56,917
|
Thank God, at least those bitch ass Tigers missed it
|
10-02-2016, 06:32 PM | #7572 |
Best Poster
Posts: 56,917
|
Woooo Toronto wins!
|
10-02-2016, 06:34 PM | #7573 |
Former TPWW Royalty
Posts: 66,592
|
Nice of the Red Sox to not care about wanting a possible #1 seed in the AL or even home field against the Indians.
1-5 to end the season and went downhill almost from the start of them clinching the division. |
10-02-2016, 06:41 PM | #7574 |
boop/bop/beep
Posts: 38,428
|
Probably loss of adrenaline etc. Plus their win streak was ridiculous, there's usually a bit of a lull after a season defining division clinching streak of play.
|
10-02-2016, 06:42 PM | #7575 |
Posts: 52,478
|
Early prediction : Boston gets swept by Cleveland
|
10-02-2016, 06:48 PM | #7576 |
Former TPWW Royalty
Posts: 66,592
|
The post-game Papi farewell speech was pretty good. Never knew Pedro Martinez was the reason why the Sox signed Papi till today.
Makes sense but just hated how they quickly reverted back to their horribleness pitching and bullpen wise from earlier in the season. |
10-02-2016, 08:15 PM | #7577 |
TPWW Fire Pro Champ
Posts: 33,995
|
Another regular season done.
Baseball Black Monday should be interesting tomorrow. |
10-02-2016, 08:54 PM | #7578 |
boop/bop/beep
Posts: 38,428
|
|
10-02-2016, 10:12 PM | #7579 |
boop/bop/beep
Posts: 38,428
|
Os bullpen and ability to hit at the Rogers Center makes them a headache for the Jays. I'd say Baltimore have a better chance winning in Toronto than at Camden. I'd actually favour Baltimore on Tuesday.
No Droford, this isn't time for you to act like a piece of shit, just being objective. |
10-02-2016, 10:19 PM | #7580 |
President of Freedonia
Posts: 58,197
|
I expect the Giants to be favored on Wednesday. Grandy and Bruce certainly have to be in the lineup even against the LHP Bumgarner as they've both been red hot, and Wilmer Flores who mashes lefties can't swing a bat so that means Duda will get the 1B assignment. But 3 lefties against Bum is no easy task.
The other concern - the Giants have a lot of speed so when Thor allows runners on it could get dicey given his slow delivery to the plate. |
10-02-2016, 11:34 PM | #7581 |
Posts: 52,478
|
|
10-03-2016, 01:17 AM | #7582 |
boop/bop/beep
Posts: 38,428
|
lol sorry Dro, but beating the Jays at this point is MEH. Yeah Jays could get hot and play some baseball but they are kittens right now.
Wait til your team has to face Texas if they get past Toronto. It'll be fucking laughable. |
10-03-2016, 08:45 AM | #7583 |
Best Poster
Posts: 56,917
|
Nobody is beating Boston
|
10-03-2016, 08:49 AM | #7584 |
President of Freedonia
Posts: 58,197
|
MLB will weep if any AL team other than Boston makes the World Series.
|
10-03-2016, 10:36 AM | #7585 |
King of Love and Piss
Posts: 62,989
|
So my quick breakdown of the Wild Card games. This is from someone who has watched all baseball religiously this year.
Mets beat the Giants- I give Bumgardner a slight edge over Thor, but the Giants bullpen has been horrific in the second half of this season. Buster Posey has been a shell of his former self this year. And despite the Mets possibly running Jay Bruce out there for a few swings, i really like there bats a lot better. There seems to be a bit more magic in this Mets team. The Mets may have been able to challenge for the division title if they werent so banged up all year. One game. I'm taking the Mets. Toronto beats Orioles - Orioles starting pitching is there biggest weakness. I'm guessing Tillman is getting the nod for Baltimore. I'll take the Blue Jays bats over Tillman whether at home or on the road to be honest with ya. I think this one will be a blow out. |
10-03-2016, 10:37 AM | #7586 |
King of Love and Piss
Posts: 62,989
|
Jayson Stark has the Red Sox.
Who will win the World Series? It's not who you think 7:21 AM CT Jayson Stark ESPN Senior Writer comment So here we go. The Chicago Cubs are going to ... Wait. Get a grip. What am I doing? What am I saying? What am I getting myself into? Yes, it's time for that column you've been looking, waiting for all these months. Time for that moment when I (incorrectly) tell you exactly who will (translation: won't) win the World Series. And it would be soooooo easy, soooooo safe, soooooo obvious to pick You Know Who. The best team in baseball. The winningest team in baseball. The team with the legendary 798-year World Series drought. (OK, so it's 108 -- whatever.) The team that would rock the planet like no one else if it actually, finally, magically wins the World Series. EDITOR'S PICKS 2016 MLB playoff schedule Check out the game and series schedules for the 2016 playoffs, including times and TV networks. What we learned: Giants are in, and now they can win it all Don't be fooled by the Giants' poor second half or their shaky offense. Now that Bruce Bochy has them into the playoffs, they won't be an easy out. But sorry, my friends. Can't do it. I made up my mind eight years ago that I am never, ever going to pick the Cubs to win the World Series again. They can thank me later. The Boston Red Sox are going to win the 2016 World Series. That's my actual (guaranteed to be inaccurate) prediction. But when it came time to write this piece, I felt there were just as many reasons to explain why I WASN'T picking the Cubs as why I WAS picking the Red Sox. So why not the Cubs? I'll get to that momentarily. But first, it's time to reveal the results of my annual Who's Going to Win the World Series survey of 25 astute baseball executives. And if you're expecting a Cubs landslide here, well, the results are revealing. I asked the group to pick the team that would advance to the World Series from each league and then predict who would win it. In the case of execs from clubs in contention, I asked them just to pick a team in their league they feared most, along with the club they thought would get to the Series from the other league. The Cubs are the obvious pick to win the World Series, but that doesn't mean everyone is picking them. Benny Sieu/AP Photo I conduct this survey every year because A) it's fascinating and B) hey, nothing makes me feel better about my own prognostication ineptitude than knowing that the smartest front-office minds in the game are just as awful at this as I am. Over the past two years, do you want to guess how many execs who took part in this exercise guessed the eventual winner of the World Series? That would be exactly ONE. None predicted the Giants in 2014. One picked the Royals last year. So keep that in mind as we unveil the results of this year's voting: American League Favorite (or Most-Feared Team) Red Sox 16 Rangers 7 Blue Jays 2* (*Survey conducted while the wild-card race was still raging.) National League Favorite (or Most-Feared Team) Cubs 13 Dodgers 10 Nationals 2 World Series Winner Cubs 7 Red Sox 6 Dodgers 4 Rangers 4 So did you expect it to be that close? Nope. Me, neither. But I got the distinct vibe that many of these folks felt much like I did -- that picking "the best team" never makes you look like a genius anyway, so why not go down some other road? "Obviously, the pick is the Cubs in the National League," quipped one NL exec. "So I like the Dodgers." "Too much hype about the Cubs," said another. "Out of principle, I won't pick them," said an AL exec. Well, I'm not sure precisely what principle is at work here. But you get the idea. So why not the Cubs? Here are four reasons why not: Best Record In MLB, Won The World Series YEAR TEAM 2009 Yankees 2007 Red Sox 1998 Yankees 1989 Athletics 1986 Mets Across the last 30 years 1. Beware of the No. 1 seed: Only three times in the past 25 postseasons has the team with sole possession of the best record in baseball won the World Series (2009 Yankees, 2007 Red Sox, 1998 Yankees). And to find the last time a National League team had the best record and won it all, you need to go back (gulp) 30 years -- to the '86 Mets. So there's that. 2. The pressure is about to mount: "In the postseason, the pressure on both teams to win is usually about 50-50," one exec said. "But in this case ... the pressure is on the Cubs every game, because of how well they've played, because of their record and, most of all, because of the expectations, especially in that city. If they lose one of the first two games at Wrigley, the pressure will be incredible." 3. What's up with Jake? Two different execs went out of their way to discuss the recent issues of Jake Arrieta, a guy whose work over his past 16 starts (4.44 ERA) looks a lot different than the superhuman impression he'd been doing over the previous year and a half. "Never seen him look so ordinary," one NL exec said after Arrieta's last start. "I would be concerned if I was them." 4. The voice of doom: Finally, the last thing a team saddled with a 108-year title drought needs is MY "support." I've been writing this column before every postseason for more than a decade. I've picked the Cubs three times -- 2003, 2007 and 2008. If you don't recall their jubilant World Series parades in any of those years, you would be correct. That's all my fault. My prediction record is so disastrous, I'm practically the Cleveland Browns of prognosticators. So why would I want to go and doom the Cubs at a time like this? If the bitter residents of Chicago ever decide to blame someone besides a billy goat, I don't need that someone to be me. I think the Cubs will get to the World Series. But somebody else can pick them to win. I'm out. Phew. Glad I got that out of the way. I feel better now. But more importantly, that allows me to move along to the other big theme of this column: The Red Sox's offense has proved to be dominant even against the best pitching. John Tlumacki/The Boston Globe via Getty Images Five reasons the Red Sox will win 1. What a lineup: The Red Sox have scored an incredible 83 more runs than the next-best offense in the American League (Cleveland). While the Blue Jays had a similar run-scoring gap last season, only one other AL team in the past 80 years has managed to put up a 100-run gap between itself and the pack -- and you need to go back all the way to the 1950 Red Sox to find that one. "Their lineup is so deep and so good," said one AL exec. "The way they work counts, foul balls off, wear down pitchers, they're just so good. And they hit good pitching." Red Sox rake against strikeout pitchers Where the Sox rank against pitchers with at least 9.0 K/9. STAT RATE RANK AVG .267 1st OBP .324 1st SLG .449 1st OPS .773 1st Source: ESPN Stats & Info 2. Their strength is greater than any other team's strength: Let's get back to that last line: They hit good pitching. Or to put this in the words of a rival GM: "Boston's offense is the singular best strength of all the teams." Now those are words that get my attention this time of year. When we try to break down which clubs profile best to survive the four-week October marathon, isn't that what we look for -- a team so dominant that even the best teams in the sport can't stop it from doing what it does best? And that's the Red Sox. Against pitchers who average a strikeout per inning or better, the Sox lead the major leagues in average, on-base percentage, slugging and OPS. Against pitchers defined as "power pitchers," Boston's OPS (.798) is 65 points higher than the next-best team. But the Red Sox are also first in OPS against "finesse" pitchers (.848). And they went into the weekend as the only team in the past five years with an OPS of .800 or better against both left-handed and right-handed pitching. So good luck finding a matchup that looks like this team's kryptonite. 3. Their rotation is better than you think: It would have been easy to theorize a month ago that this team didn't have enough starting pitching to navigate October. But you might want to rethink that. Clay Buchholz and Eduardo Rodriguez have made 11 starts between them since Sept. 1. They've allowed two runs or fewer in eight of those starts. Nobody questions whether Rick Porcello is the real deal anymore. ("He's dangerous, super-confident, incredibly intelligent and super-aggressive," said one rival exec. "He's put it all together.") And while you can feel free to question David Price's 5.12 career postseason ERA, "I'd rather have him pitching Game 1 or 2 than a lot of guys," a longtime NL exec said. Price is 8-0 and 2.37 in his past eight starts against teams other than the Yankees (who won't be participating), for what that's worth. 4. Their bullpen is hot: Amazing how the return of Koji Uehara has put the pieces of this bullpen back in place. Since the beginning of September, the Red Sox pen ranks second in the AL in ERA (1.81), and first in opponent average (.198) and strikeout rate (10.4 K/9). The funny thing is, aside from concerns about their left-handed relief, the most questions I heard about anyone in this bullpen were about the closer, Craig Kimbrel, mostly because of his 15 walks in his past 20 innings. ("There are days it looks like he just doesn't trust himself, and I don't know why," said one scout.) But if the biggest worry in this bullpen is a man with 83 strikeouts and just 28 hits in 53 innings, that doesn't sound like much of a crisis to me. 5. Papi Power: Every once in a while in sports, the script writes itself. So there's just something about the way the stars keep lining up for David Ortiz's retirement tour that feels as if there could be one more incredible chapter to come. One NL exec admits that when he picked the Red Sox, "that's part of the equation. There's definitely something magical about it." Well, if there is, you might want to file this away. According to Elias Sports Bureau research, only two position players in the past 60 years (Dal Maxvill and Gene Tenace, back in the 1960s, '70s and '80s) have won four World Series without sneaking onto the Yankees. And nobody has won four for a team that wasn't the Yankees since Jim Gilliam did it for the Dodgers in the '50s and '60s. Well, Big Papi already has three rings. And October looms. So there you have it. Five carefully thought-out reasons why this pick makes sense, backed with the reassuring support of a bunch of really bright people in the game. Now what could possibly go wrong? Outside of the fact that any team in this tournament (including the Cubs) could turn into the 2014 Giants as soon as this fun begins, I can think of only one thing that could get in the way of the Red Sox's fourth ride on the duck boats in the past 12 years: That they just got picked by me to win it all, of course. Which means they're now officially doomed. |
10-03-2016, 11:09 AM | #7587 |
Posts: 52,478
|
Red Sox lost 5 off their last 6
Craig Kimbrel sucks David Price chokes in the playoffs The Indians will beat the Red Sox in at least 4 but maybe a sweep. |
10-03-2016, 11:10 AM | #7588 |
boop/bop/beep
Posts: 38,428
|
shut the fuck up
|
10-03-2016, 11:11 AM | #7589 |
King of Love and Piss
Posts: 62,989
|
That reminds me. The Indians are in the playoffs. Cute.
|
10-03-2016, 11:42 AM | #7590 |
President of Freedonia
Posts: 58,197
|
I think the only potential WS matchup I have no interest in seeing is Giants/Red Sox. 2 fanbases that have won a ton over the last decade, meh.
|
10-03-2016, 01:08 PM | #7591 |
President of Freedonia
Posts: 58,197
|
Awards
NL MVP: Kris Bryant CY: Jon Lester ROTY: Corey Seager MOTY: Dave Roberts CPOTY: Wil Myers Best Moment: Bartolo Colon HR Worst Moment: Jose Fernandez AL MVP: Mike Trout CY: Rick Porcello ROTY: Michael Fulmer MOTY: Terry Francona CPOTY: Ian Desmond Best Moment: Judge/Austin HR back to back in first career ABs Worst Moment: Juan Uribe 106 MPH ball to the groin |
10-03-2016, 01:20 PM | #7592 |
Posts: 10,642
|
Trout won't win mvp because voters are stupid and they'll hold his team stinking against him. Mookie Betts is more than likely your 2016 mvp.
|
10-03-2016, 01:25 PM | #7593 |
President of Freedonia
Posts: 58,197
|
Agreed. I was just giving my picks if I had a vote.
Came very close to Kluber over Porcello and a few other names I debated with Lester, especially Scherzer. Both Cy Young races were really tough calls. |
10-03-2016, 01:26 PM | #7594 |
President of Freedonia
Posts: 58,197
|
In b4 Droford posts a 5 paragraph expository essay on the merits of Zach Britton winning the Cy Young
|
10-03-2016, 02:20 PM | #7595 |
Posts: 10,642
|
I'd go Kluber over Porcello. The wins do not give me googley eyes.
|
10-03-2016, 02:21 PM | #7596 |
Posts: 10,642
|
Here's my argument on why Britton shouldn't the CY award; Mariano Rivera, arguably the greatest reliever of all time, never won the award.
|
10-03-2016, 02:59 PM | #7597 |
TPWW Fire Pro Champ
Posts: 33,995
|
Only thing Porcello got going is the wins. If that's all we're looking at in terms of Cy Young voting, the system is flawed/broken.
Tanaka got a good case for Cy Young. Probably won't win, but he's got the numbers in the right categories to make an argument. |
10-03-2016, 04:08 PM | #7598 |
Former TPWW Royalty
Posts: 66,592
|
Walt Weiss out as Rockies manager after the team didn't bother to renew his contract. Robin Ventura out as White Sox manager. Former Cubs manager Rick Renteria got hired as the new manager for the team. |
10-03-2016, 04:31 PM | #7599 | |
Posts: 52,478
|
Quote:
Only 3 times Did Rivera have more Ks (83 80 and 77) than Britton 74 Zach Britton only allowed 1 HR Rivera allowed 2 twice. Britton only allowed 38 hits in 67 innings. Rivera only once allowed less (35) but in 47 innings. I could keep going |
|
10-03-2016, 04:41 PM | #7600 |
President of Freedonia
Posts: 58,197
|
|