Jesus. Noid. Listen.
I'm not claiming she lied once therefore she must always be lying/is definitely lying. Stop and read what I'm saying.
You think "Women tend to not lie about rape" is a meaningful point. Because she's a woman making a rape accusation therefore you're comparing the likelihood of her lying to what typically ends up being the case when a woman makes a rape accusation.
Yet you're dismissing "She DOES lie about rape" (Not that she 100% must always be lying. That she indeed has been known to lie about rape.) as meaningless. That's a glaring contradiction. You want to give her the benefit of all other women who don't lie about rape but ignore the DIRECT example of HER... THE ONE WOMAN WHO IS ACTUALLY BEING DISCUSSED... lying about rape.
It's a contradiction. How is it not?
Last edited by #1-norm-fan; 05-17-2018 at 04:43 PM.
|