Microsoft have strict rules about what Avatars can and cannot do. I can't see us having exsplosive cage matches or jabbing forks in each others eyes. I can't see them allowing anything other than the basic one on one and tag matches.
Weapons and gimmick matches would be too violent for the Avatars. Not saying the game can't be fun but I can't see having as many options as other FPW games had. I only ever played one game in the series, in Japanese, so I didn't get far.
Quote:
Player interacts with their avatar as if it's a separate character
A player's avatar does not have an autonomous personality or instinct. The avatar is under the control of the owning player. It can have idle animations and can respond appropriately to game events but it should not interact with the user as if it is separate from the player, try to get the player's attention in an annoying manner.
Violence which causes blood, gore, dismemberment, decapitation, maiming, or mutilation
Cartoon violence is allowed. Violence is allowed as long as there is no blood, gore, dismemberment, decapitation, maiming, or mutilation. An example of allowable injuries includes injuries that might befall an avatar in a sporting event such as American football. Avatars can die temporarily to depict failure.
Player's avatar talks
The player's avatar should not have their own voice. They are allowed to make individual sounds, such as laughing and crying but otherwise cannot use a voice.
|
Source.
Would a steel chair count as cartoon violence?