View Single Post
Old 01-02-2018, 04:58 PM   #189
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 60,919
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by #1-wwf-fan View Post
Yeah. And there's two titles now. And like I said earlier, the rumble winner has actually opened the show as many times as they've closed the show when there's been two titles. So it's not insane to think a heel would win since it's likely just gonna lead to a match in the middle of the card anyway. Both title matches don't have to be the face chasing. They can tell different stories.
It's not insane to think that a heel would win, but it's more that they should win that is garnering criticism. I mean, should the Rumble Winner head into an opening match? You're arguing what the WWE does, but I think Destor and I are coming at it from a logical perspective. Why would you waste such a big star-making moment on a heel that you're hopefully going to beat at WrestleMania? It kind of washes away the whole event.
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote