View Single Post
Old 10-18-2017, 12:39 AM   #1515
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 60,919
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Wouldn't Kane be going after Roman Reigns because he retired The Undertaker? If The Undertaker comes back to defend him, then why would Kane fight him? It makes no sense. Therefore it goes up in likelihood.

So Enzo was helping the 3rd hour ratings whereas Roman hurt them? Listening to the SCG Radio podcasts on the timeline, it's incredible to look back and see how much information WCW had in 1999. Things were going well in 1998, but they were getting feedback from the ratings where certain acts were scoring lower than the average rating for the show. It's obviously not that dramatic, but the 3rd hour doing well under Enzo but not under Reigns makes a very clear statement that is going to be very frustrating in retrospect.
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote