Thread: DISCUSSION - Could "Montreal" have been averted by Bret Hart jobbing to Undertaker on RAW the next night?
View Single Post
Old 04-01-2016, 01:10 PM   #2
Heyman
Father of Hinduship
 
Heyman's Avatar
 
Posts: 21,083
Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
-Undertaker is a guy that Bret respected, and would have done the job to.


-Shawn would have still looked 'strong' against Bret due to the Hart Foundation having to interfere to cause the DQ.


One problem I have against the argument of, "Well - the whole point of Shawn going CLEANLY over Bret is that it makes Shawn look more credible for his inevitable collision with Austin," is that Shawn got absolutely man-handled by Undertaker at Bad Blood (before Kane interfered), and so "making Shawn look like a boss" was kind of in vain anyways.
Heyman is offline   Reply With Quote