Thread: Forbes: SD sucks and needs to change - do you agree?
View Single Post
Old 02-23-2018, 07:20 PM   #24
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 60,919
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Simple Fan View Post
Stank? Do you see what you type sometimes? How would WWE bringing back the WCW name have any stank on it? It's not like it would be the same company it was before and even then I don't understand how it has stank.
They've spent years telling their audience that WCW was a hick company that always made bad financial decisions, got lucky, and then had a slow death because of incompetence. As recently as WrestleMania 31 they went out of their way to make sure that WWE was perceived as superior.

And if your plan is to bring back WCW as a completely different entity -- what's the point of using the initials WCW?
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote