TPWW Forums - View Single Post - QUESTION - Should WWE appoint Kevin Nash as new head booker?

**Evil Vito** · 11-12-2017, 10:08 AM

QUESTION - Should WWE appoint Kevin Nash as new head booker?

It's no secret that the creative direction in WWE has been stagnant for quite some time. The weekly television drags on with most of what you see on the show not amounting to much in the long run, and the PPVs feel largely meaningless.

Only one man is qualified to undertake creative for a company that produces both a 3 hour show and a 2 hour show every week: Kevin Nash.

Per Nash himself, the Monday WCW booking meeting was a disaster and a half because Thunder taped 2 episodes at a time, therefore meaning the following week's Nitro had to be written in order to write the 2nd episode of Thunder.

In total, the committee had to sit down and write 10 hours of television every meeting - and that's before you even consider that somebody could get hurt during a show which would fuck the following episodes up, or somebody could decide to not go along with what the bookers wanted to do ("that doesn't work for me, brother").

In modern WWE, everything is live which fixes one of the main pitfalls of WCW's booking schedule. Due to the brand split the committee won't have a roster anywhere near as bloated as WCW to try to write for. And since the shows are live and can be written the day of the event they won't be blindsided by injuries or illnesses that could've fucked everything up when they'd have to write 2 weeks at a time.

Best of all, the modern WWE roster doesn't have a lot of the same toxic egos that could make all the booking plans go to waste, brother. The only person that would need to sign off is Vince, and Vince would listen to Nash if he has any sense.

So what say you TPWW? Should Kevin Nash get the opportunity be the savior of WWE creative?

11-12-2017, 10:08 AM	#1
Evil Vito President of Freedonia Posts: 58,167	QUESTION - Should WWE appoint Kevin Nash as new head booker? QUESTION - Should WWE appoint Kevin Nash as new head booker? It's no secret that the creative direction in WWE has been stagnant for quite some time. The weekly television drags on with most of what you see on the show not amounting to much in the long run, and the PPVs feel largely meaningless. Only one man is qualified to undertake creative for a company that produces both a 3 hour show and a 2 hour show every week: Kevin Nash. Per Nash himself, the Monday WCW booking meeting was a disaster and a half because Thunder taped 2 episodes at a time, therefore meaning the following week's Nitro had to be written in order to write the 2nd episode of Thunder. In total, the committee had to sit down and write 10 hours of television every meeting - and that's before you even consider that somebody could get hurt during a show which would fuck the following episodes up, or somebody could decide to not go along with what the bookers wanted to do ("that doesn't work for me, brother"). In modern WWE, everything is live which fixes one of the main pitfalls of WCW's booking schedule. Due to the brand split the committee won't have a roster anywhere near as bloated as WCW to try to write for. And since the shows are live and can be written the day of the event they won't be blindsided by injuries or illnesses that could've fucked everything up when they'd have to write 2 weeks at a time. Best of all, the modern WWE roster doesn't have a lot of the same toxic egos that could make all the booking plans go to waste, brother. The only person that would need to sign off is Vince, and Vince would listen to Nash if he has any sense. So what say you TPWW? Should Kevin Nash get the opportunity be the savior of WWE creative?