Thread: NFL Thread
View Single Post
Old 02-10-2016, 09:59 AM   #6179
#1-norm-fan
Resident drug enabler
 
#1-norm-fan's Avatar
 
Posts: 45,473
#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
No. You only look at wins and losses when they work AGAINST Manning. It's the way of the Manning hater.

Manning had the worst season of his career. You'd think that would put the guy who sucks so bad in the playoffs even further behind the guy who's so great in them. They're still neck-and-neck statistically. So if you wanna keep the Manning hate going , you've gotta ignore the stat comparison (or do that thing Droford does where he hypes up the positive Flacco stats and the negative Manning stats instead of just looking at the overall career playoff stats of both guys and calling it a day.)

So then you have to claim wins as the deciding factor. Which is pretty dumb in a team sport to begin with. But it can't be Super Bowl wins now because Manning has the lead in that one. I mean... Jesus Christ. lol
#1-norm-fan is offline