I feel differently; that New Vegas was better.
However, I can kinda see where that disconnect lies. With 3 being situated in such a way to try to start to establish their own lore on the East Coast, New Vegas seems like a bit of a disconnect for the influx of fans brought in by 3 that weren't there for the first two games.
And although I think you meant "bugs are what makes it a Bethesda game", I can't really correct that since the predecessors weren't without fault. It's just their faults were generally more dialoge-centric (unflagged options, dialogue loops, etc.,) and less graphical "npcs falling off the world" stuff.
That aside, both are worth playing through. Of course, I'm a huge fan of the series as a whole.
|