Thread: Which was worse, WCW or TNA/Impact?
View Single Post
Old 03-08-2018, 03:20 PM   #34
Destor
I am the cheese
 
Destor's Avatar
 
Posts: 51,009
Destor makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Destor makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Destor makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Destor makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Destor makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Destor makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Destor makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Destor makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Destor makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Destor makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Destor makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Destor makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Destor makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bad News Gertner View Post
WCW had a great 1 and a half years. Their highs were way higher than TNA, but their lows were way lower than TNA. With the amount of resources WCW had, there's no way they should have been that bad. Not by a mile. WCW 2000 was unwatchable. I can't say that about any year in TNA.
I think you're being farrrr too harsh to say 18 months but its bit subjective so I wont argue the point too fiercely outside of saying I think the WCW product was pretty great from the bulk of 96 to 99 and a good product pre-96 to its inception. With a clear low point at the end.
Destor is offline   Reply With Quote