Thread: Fallout 4
View Single Post
Old 04-09-2017, 11:47 PM   #1111
Tom Guycott
I W C DEEZ NUTZ!
 
Tom Guycott's Avatar
 
Posts: 10,136
Tom Guycott makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Tom Guycott makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Tom Guycott makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Tom Guycott makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Tom Guycott makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Tom Guycott makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Tom Guycott makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Tom Guycott makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Tom Guycott makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Tom Guycott makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Tom Guycott makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Tom Guycott makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Tom Guycott makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
I feel differently; that New Vegas was better.

However, I can kinda see where that disconnect lies. With 3 being situated in such a way to try to start to establish their own lore on the East Coast, New Vegas seems like a bit of a disconnect for the influx of fans brought in by 3 that weren't there for the first two games.

And although I think you meant "bugs are what makes it a Bethesda game", I can't really correct that since the predecessors weren't without fault. It's just their faults were generally more dialoge-centric (unflagged options, dialogue loops, etc.,) and less graphical "npcs falling off the world" stuff.

That aside, both are worth playing through. Of course, I'm a huge fan of the series as a whole.
Tom Guycott is online now   Reply With Quote