View Single Post
Old 01-02-2018, 03:00 AM   #159
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 60,894
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by #1-wwf-fan View Post
Since 2006, when there are two world title matches at WrestleMania, the winner of the Royal Rumble has opened the show as much as he has closed it out. Much like winning titles in the 2 title era, winning the rumble isn't treated as a major accomplishment as much as it used to be.
No, you're 100% correct. That's why it's hard to pick a winner from SmackDown, because the title match almost doesn't matter. It could be AJ Styles vs. Baron Corbin, truthfully. I think the biggest thing about a SmackDown guy winning it would be that they're likely going to eliminate Reigns last in Philly, which is going to get them a MOLTEN pop. More than winning the actual Rumble itself, the moment will stand out for people. Kind of like when Dolph Ziggler cashed in Money in the Bank.
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote