View Single Post
Old 12-07-2017, 05:52 PM   #40
#1-norm-fan
Resident drug enabler
 
#1-norm-fan's Avatar
 
Posts: 45,473
#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Damian Rey 2.0 View Post
I agree with the hierarchy. She should squash the Alicia Fox and Dana Brooke types (I'm sorry I love you Alicia), have competitive but convincing victories over the Sasha Banks, Bailey and Becky Lynch types, while Nia gives her a challenge and Asuka ahs Charlotte on close to her and can beat her.
Exactly. If they bring her in and try to make EVERYONE look good against her, it's counterproductive. We know what the division is. If she's struggling just like all the other divas, it just brings her down to the division's level. If she's squashing people in a way no one else is, she suddenly raises the bar. Now if Sasha or Charlotte or whoever they're invested in suddenly takes the unbeatable monster to the limit, they look incredibly strong despite the loss. It's a simple enough concept.
#1-norm-fan is offline   Reply With Quote