Quote:
Originally Posted by Seanny One Ball
One of the most overrated films ever put to screen. Kubrick wasn't a genius.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seanny One Ball
No, it's easy to say because it's not a great or particularly good film. It's a very pretty, absurdly boring graphic novel. It looks exactly like a great big comic minus the action and adventure.
I'm not a fan of films that rely on visual effects rather than scripts. I'm not a Kubrick fan at all and aside from that I firmly believe that long before 2001 there were better films that offer more to the genre.
Arthur C Clarke was pretty cool though.
Rod Serling was the greatest contributor to screen science fiction and there's more credible, thought provoking, provocative writing in a Twilight Zone 30 second intro than in the three hours of 2001.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seanny One Ball
I'm not denying the technical prowess of the film nor am I arguing against anybody enjoying it.
What I am saying is that to me it is simply boring.
I'd get bored of looking at any pretty things especially if they didn't do much beyond look nice. That's why I don't hang pictures up.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seanny One Ball
Kubrick just wasn't my kind of storyteller. Him and Michael Cimino had a lot in common that way. Too busy painting with cameras.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Guycott
That was a lot of vitriol over 2001.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kalyx triaD
I like that he says everybody else is upset. This all started with his revolt against one of the most well known major influences in cinema. Cause he didn't like it.
|
None of this is vitriolic.
It's certainly unforgiving, but clearly not vitriolic or a "revolt". Saying something is boring is not bitter or malicious you idiots.
You guys are fucking terrible interpreters.
If someone makes a thread about something you cannot expect everybody to respond positively if they don't like it.
Fuck off.