View Single Post
Old 06-22-2017, 07:25 AM   #14
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 60,937
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
I'm mixed on the women's show. I can understand the reasoning behind having one. A hierarchy can develop. A proper mid-card, tag division, etc. would give the women a chance to develop meaning in their programs. The key word there is "chance," because I don't know how nuanced or effective this show is going to be in achieving those goals. The cruiserweights have their own show and it sucks.

If Triple H handled it and got it to run off indy geek support, I could see it working -- but I don't know if it would make them any money. I think they're better off just having good women's storylines on the main roster and not fucking their talent up.
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote