Quote:
$5 for new hair. $5 for new suits. $5 for more hair. |
Quote:
*Search negative* Free DLC might be naive, but I doubt he was asking to pay for it. Nor is it impossible. If Koei can release new outfits and shit for free, surely Rockstar can. |
When I read "DLC", I ALWAYS assume paid unless specified as free. If I'm wrong, okay. Free DLC like that is :y:.
|
Absolutely. I should've specified that the game should start out like GTA 4, where you only have a limited selection of clothes and no options for haircuts or tattoos, but later on sometime after its release, Rockstar starts creating and releasing new clothes, haircuts, and tattoos as DLC for free. I sure wouldn't pay though.
|
Bring back the army tanks
|
And a hidden 'attack dog ' cheat where dogs come outta nowhere and kill pedestrians around you
|
Can't forget to bring back the pedestrians riot cheat as well.
Was always worth a few laughs seeing everyone start brawling while just watching the whole thing occur in Vice City while in San Andreas it was an even bigger riot with smoke coming from buildings and cars on fire everywhere. |
I like how my sweet ride hoarding was useful in Los Santos at the end of SA due to the lack of cars.
|
Quote:
Quote:
However, Saints Row 2 offered the Unkut pack, and that added a ton of stuff. Was it as pretty as GTAIV? No, but certainly they could do it. Continued support is a good way to keep people buying your game, and freedbies always help. |
Its funny, I always have a Tampa and a remodeled Clover in the Garage from the Start.
|
I have a TARDIS. I win. :shifty:
|
Quote:
|
Playing wasted I stole bikes and hid them.
|
Quote:
|
If it's anything like the last game, the plot will be cardboard, anyway.
I hear the expansions were good, but hooboy. |
To be frank, Liberty City in GTA4 wasn't that much fun to dick around in either.
|
New trailer this week!
|
Quote:
|
I am not counting online and I found SA far more entertaining with all the cool places to go.
|
yeah SA and VC were way way better than GTA 4.
|
VC wasn't as good in my opinion. In SA you just felt like you were free to do whatever. Here you feel like you are in a box.
|
In terms of gameplay, San Andreas = the most enjoyable video game I’ve ever played, hands down. I simply don’t get why people want realism in games. If I wanted realism, I’d get in my car.
|
Do you really not understand why people want realism in games or are you just saying that
|
Depends on how far the realism goes, honestly.
If you think GTA 4 is "realistic", I've got news for you. |
Quote:
If people wanted realism, Call of Duty would be weeks of asking your parents to buy you better equipment, followed by 18 months recovering from combat in a shitty hospital that's underfunded and forgotten because it only serves people no longer fighting. It's not "realism" people want, it's sluggish brown they want. Still, in an era where millions of people are playing games which equate to chores, GTA is kind of a minor offender. |
Ok, we're at that time again when an "unnamed source" starts claiming to have details about the next GTA game. The details had two parts, one was just general details and the other was major spoilers. I haven't read the major spoilers so what I'm posting here is the general details.
These spoilers tell you... Who the main character is. Where and when it takes place. How the story begins. What the game revolves around. What game modes are in and how many players the MP has. Info about the PC version. Info about the map. Minor gameplay details. SPOILER: show If you read and post the major spoilers, always mark them as such. I don't want to come into this thread and see the ending has been posted. I had LA Noire and Red Dead Redemption spoiled for me because of that, I don't want that happening with GTA V. |
Quote:
|
Mt Chilliad :D
|
Quote:
|
The driving in GTA 4 was far from realistic, and the story was pretty amazing, probably the best in the series. WTF?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
As much fun as each GTA has been, VC and SA had the same basic story. You start with nothing, you do some work for various people, an antagonist is introduced, you eventually kill the antagonist, you get rich and/or powerful, role credits. I guess I just don't like the whole rags to riches story. It was good that GTA IV didn't follow that formula exactly, though I know it did follow it to a degree. It felt more satifying to me to have Niko/Johnny have a bitter sweet ending of "It's over, but..." than if they included an ending where Niko becomes a multimillionaire crime lord. It wasn't all gloom, though. Luis had a pretty happy ending for a GTA game. It showed you could have a "happy" ending without going the money and power route each time. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
what?
|
he said you're not retarded, fignuts lite. can't you fucking read
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:32 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®